Sony A6700 vs Nikon Z5 II camera comparison

Sony A6700 vs Nikon Z5 II – Which one is better?

Sony A6700 vs Nikon Z5 II – Which One Is Better?

When comparing the Sony A6700 and Nikon Z5 II, you’re weighing two very capable mirrorless cameras—but with very different sensor formats and target users.

Here’s a breakdown to help you decide which one fits you best.


⚙️ Overview – APS-C Compact Hybrid vs Full-Frame All-Rounder

Sony A6700:
An APS-C mirrorless camera focused on hybrid creators—still + video—offering a compact form, excellent autofocus, and modern features.

Nikon Z5 II:
A full-frame mirrorless camera serving as a more accessible gateway into full-frame, with strong stills and video features, large sensor advantage, and system depth.

In short:

  • A6700 = Best for creators who want lightweight gear, APS-C size, strong video + still capability.

  • Z5 II = Best for photographers or hybrid shooters wanting full-frame image quality, deeper system options, and long-term investment.


📸 Key Specifications Comparison

Feature Sony A6700 Nikon Z5 II
Release Date July 2023 October 2024
Camera Type Mirrorless (Hybrid APS-C) Mirrorless (Hybrid Full Frame)
Sensor APS-C 26.0 MP BSI-CMOS Full-Frame 24.5 MP CMOS
Image Processor BIONZ XR + AI Processing Unit EXPEED 7
Lens Mount Sony E-mount Nikon Z-mount
ISO Range 100–32,000 (expandable to 102,400) 100–64,000 (expandable to 204,800)
In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS) Yes, 5-axis Yes, 5-axis
Autofocus System Hybrid phase-detection AF (759 points) Hybrid phase-detection AF (~299 points)
AF Subject Recognition Humans, animals, birds, insects, vehicles, aircraft Humans, animals, birds, vehicles
Continuous Shooting Speed Up to 11 fps Up to 7.5 fps
Video Recording Up to 4K 120p Up to 4K 60p (cropped)
Video Bit Depth / Color 10-bit 4:2:2 internal 10-bit via HDMI, 8-bit internal
Color Profiles S-Log3, S-Cinetone, HLG N-Log, HLG
RAW Video Output Yes, 16-bit via HDMI No
Recording Limit No recording limit (thermal dependent) No recording limit (thermal dependent)
Viewfinder 2.36M-dot OLED EVF 3.69M-dot OLED EVF
LCD Screen 3.0″ fully articulating touchscreen (1.03M dots) 3.2″ tilting touchscreen (2.1M dots)
Touch Functions Yes (AF, tracking, menus) Yes (AF, menus)
Product Showcase Mode No No
Background Defocus Button No No
Body Material Magnesium alloy Magnesium alloy
Weather Sealing Yes (basic sealing) Yes (advanced sealing)
Audio Options Mic input, headphone out, digital MI shoe Mic input, headphone out
Connectivity Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-C, HDMI Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-C, HDMI
Battery Type NP-FZ100 EN-EL15c
Battery Life (CIPA) Approx. 570 shots Approx. 470 shots
Dimensions (W × H × D) 122 × 69 × 75.1 mm 134 × 100.5 × 72 mm
Weight (Body Only) Approx. 409 g Approx. 700 g
Price (Body Only) Approx. USD 1,399 (check on Amazon) Approx. USD 1,700 (check on Amazon)

🧱 Build, Handling & Portability

The A6700 wins on portability: smaller sensor, lighter body, easier to carry, more discreet for travel/run-and-gun.
The Z5 II, being full-frame, has a larger footprint, heavier lenses generally, and larger gear load—but offers the “full-frame experience.”

👉 Verdict:

  • Choose A6700 if you prioritise lightweight gear and portability.

  • Choose Z5 II if you are fine with larger gear for full-frame benefits.


🎯 Autofocus & Performance

Both offer strong autofocus. The A6700 excels in modern APS-C hybrid workflows (video + stills) with high-speed tracking, etc. The Z5 II brings full-frame advantages—better depth of field control, better low-light headroom, and strong overall performance.

👉 Verdict:

  • For fast action, hybrid shooting in lighter gear → A6700.

  • For full-frame image quality, stills priority and longer term system strength → Z5 II.


🎥 Video Capabilities

If video is an important part of your workflow:

  • A6700: Very good for hybrid creators and APS-C size gear.

  • Z5 II: Offers full-frame video advantages—larger sensor, better background separation, more premium presentation—but you’ll be carrying bigger lenses/body.

👉 Verdict:

  • Video-centric & portability → A6700.

  • Video + stills with full-frame depth → Z5 II.


🧠 Image Quality (Stills)

Full-frame sensor (Z5 II) provides advantages: better low-light, greater dynamic range head-room in many cases, more room for cropping and large prints. APS-C (A6700) still gives very high quality, but some compromises in depth-of-field, low-light may appear in extreme conditions.

👉 Verdict:

  • If stills image quality is top priority → Z5 II.

  • If you’re happy with excellent APS-C quality and value portability → A6700.


🔋 Ecosystem & Future-Proofing

E-Mount (Sony) is extremely flexible (APS-C and full-frame lenses). Z-Mount (Nikon) is full-frame from the start, giving more future-proofing if you stay in Nikon full-frame system.

👉 Verdict:

  • For broad lens flexibility and upgrades (including full-frame) → Z5 II.

  • For more compact system and APS-C value → A6700.


💰 Price & Value

The APS-C A6700 presents a strong value with high-end features in a smaller package. The full-frame Z5 II costs more (body + larger lenses) but justifies it for full-frame benefits and upgrade path.

👉 Verdict:

  • If budget and gear size matter → A6700.

  • If you’re ready to invest in full-frame and make it your system → Z5 II.

Check availability and price on Amazon 🛒

📷 Nikon Z5 II — Amazon USA / Amazon Canada / Amazon UK / Amazon Australia

📷 Sony A6700 Amazon USA / Amazon Canada / Amazon UK / Amazon Australia

(As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases — at no extra cost to you.)


🏁 Final Verdict — Sony A6700 vs Nikon Z5 II

Type of User Recommended Camera
Content creator/workflow with hybrid video + stills, weight/size matter Sony A6700
Photographer or hybrid shooter wanting full-frame image quality and system build Nikon Z5 II
Travel/street shooter prioritising lighter kit A6700
Stills-first shooter needing full-frame depth, large prints Z5 II

✅ In Summary:

  • Choose Sony A6700 if you want a premium APS-C body with excellent performance, modern features, lightweight gear and hybrid flexibility.

  • Choose Nikon Z5 II if you want a full-frame body, the benefits of full-frame image quality, better low-light headroom and a more serious system investment.


🧠 Final Thoughts

Both cameras are excellent—but the “better” one depends entirely on how you shoot, what gear you carry, and what features you prioritise.

  • If you carry your camera everywhere, shoot hybrid content, travel often and want smaller kit → go A6700.

  • If you shoot stills seriously (or mixed video + stills), want full-frame depth and plan a long-term system → go Z5 II.

Reflect on your workflow, lens collection, budget, and future plans—and pick the camera that aligns best with you.

Similar Posts