Sony A6700 vs Fujifilm X-T50 – Which One Is Better?

The Sony A6700 and Fujifilm X-T50 are both excellent mirrorless cameras—but for very different kinds of creators.

The A6700 is a high-performance APS-C model with cutting-edge features, while the X-T50 emphasizes style, photographic experience, and portability.

Below is a detailed comparison to help you decide which one fits you best.

---

⚙️ Overview – High-End APS-C vs Style-And-Photography-Focused APS-C

Sony A6700:
An APS-C mirrorless camera designed for creators who want top specs, advanced autofocus, hybrid photo + video capability and a strong all-round performer.

Fujifilm X-T50:
An APS-C mirrorless camera built for photographers who value image quality, tactile controls, Fujifilm’s film simulation color science and a stylish, intuitive camera body.

In short:

• A6700 = Best for speed, hybrid performance, modern specs and creators who want high-end in an APS-C body.

• X-T50 = Best for photographers who focus on stills (with some video) and want an enjoyable camera experience, less gear weight and refined look.

---

📸 Detailed Specifications Comparison

Feature	Sony A6700	Fujifilm X-T50
Release Date	July 2023	June 2024
Camera Type	Mirrorless (Hybrid APS-C)	Mirrorless (Compact APS-C)
Sensor	APS-C 26.0 MP BSI-CMOS	APS-C 40.2 MP X-Trans CMOS 5 HR
Image Processor	BIONZ XR + AI Processing Unit	X-Processor 5
Lens Mount	Sony E-mount	Fujifilm X-mount
ISO Range	100–32,000 (expandable to 102,400)	125–12,800 (expandable to 64–51,200)
In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS)	Yes, 5-axis	No
Autofocus System	Hybrid phase-detection AF (759 points)	Hybrid phase-detection AF (425 points)
AF Subject Recognition	Humans, animals, birds, insects, vehicles, aircraft	Humans, animals, birds, vehicles
Continuous Shooting Speed	Up to 11 fps	Up to 8 fps (mechanical), 20 fps (electronic, crop)
Video Recording	Up to 4K 120p	Up to 6.2K 30p, 4K 60p
Video Bit Depth / Color	10-bit 4:2:2 internal	10-bit 4:2:2 internal
Color Profiles	S-Log3, S-Cinetone, HLG	F-Log2, Film Simulations
RAW Video Output	Yes, 16-bit via HDMI	Yes, 12-bit via HDMI
Recording Limit	No recording limit (thermal dependent)	No recording limit (thermal dependent)
Viewfinder	2.36M-dot OLED EVF	2.36M-dot OLED EVF
LCD Screen	3.0″ fully articulating touchscreen (1.03M dots)	3.0″ tilting touchscreen (1.62M dots)
Touch Functions	Yes (AF, tracking, menus)	Yes (AF, menus)
Product Showcase Mode	No	No
Background Defocus Button	No	No
Body Material	Magnesium alloy	Magnesium alloy
Weather Sealing	Yes (basic sealing)	No
Audio Options	Mic input, headphone out, digital MI shoe	Mic input, headphone via USB-C
Connectivity	Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-C, HDMI	Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-C, HDMI
Battery Type	NP-FZ100	NP-W126S
Battery Life (CIPA)	Approx. 570 shots	Approx. 305 shots
Dimensions (W × H × D)	122 × 69 × 75.1 mm	123.8 × 84 × 48.8 mm
Weight (Body Only)	Approx. 409 g	Approx. 329 g
Price (Body Only)	Approx. USD 1,399 (check on Amazon)	Approx. USD 999

---

🧱 Build, Handling & Portability

The Sony A6700 offers performance-packed specs in a compact APS-C body but may still carry the weight and size necessary for advanced features. It is well suited for creators who want serious capability and are comfortable carrying a moderately sized kit.

The Fujifilm X-T50 emphasizes portability, lightweight build, comfortable handling with tactile controls, and a stylish look. It’s ideal for people who prefer to carry less gear, want a camera you enjoy using for still photography, and perhaps less frequent heavy video work.

👉 Verdict:

• Choose A6700 if you want performance and versatility, and are comfortable with slightly larger gear.

• Choose X-T50 if you prioritize portability, photography experience, style, and lighter gear.

---

🎯 Autofocus & Performance

Both cameras offer very capable autofocus systems, but with subtle differences:

• The A6700 is likely to have superior tracking and video-oriented AF, making it more flexible for hybrid workflows and action.

• The X-T50 focuses on stills, and while its AF is strong for photography, it may not match the hybrid speed and tracking of Sony’s high-end APS-C models.

👉 Verdict:

• For fast moving subjects, video or hybrid shooting: A6700.

• For stills, comfortable handling, and photography-centric use: X-T50.

---

🎥 Video Capabilities

For video:

• Sony A6700 shines with higher-end video specs, making it more capable for creators who do both stills and video and may require advanced workflows.

• Fujifilm X-T50 is excellent for photography with some video capabilities—but if video is a major part of your workflow, it may not be as strong as the A6700.

👉 Verdict:

• Choose A6700 if video is important alongside stills.

• Choose X-T50 if stills are your primary focus and video is secondary.

---

🧠 Image Quality (Stills)

Both cameras share APS-C sensors of very similar resolution, so image quality will be excellent on both. However:

• The Fujifilm X-T50 brings Fujifilm’s distinctive color science, film simulation modes, and a user experience that maximizes still photography enjoyment.

• The Sony A6700 offers more flexibility and hybrid use, which may appeal to creators who do both stills and video or want more future-proof features.

👉 Verdict:

• For photography-first composers who enjoy the camera experience: X-T50.

• For image quality plus flexibility and hybrid use: A6700.

---

🔋 Ecosystem, Lenses & Future-Proofing

• Sony E-Mount gives the A6700 access to a massive lens ecosystem (APS-C and full-frame), strong third-party support, and future system flexibility.

• Fujifilm X-Mount gives the X-T50 access to many excellent compact primes, a system designed around photographers, and great value in APS-C lenses.

👉 Verdict:

• If system growth, lens variety and future-proofing matter: A6700 has the edge.

• If you choose a compact photography system now and want minimal gear with excellent lenses already: X-T50 works very well.

---

💰 Price & Value

Since the X-T50 emphasizes photography and lighter gear, it likely offers better value if video isn’t a major component of your work. The A6700 costs more but offers more flexibility and performance.

👉 Verdict:

• If budget and photography focus matter: X-T50.

• If you value performance and hybrid capability: A6700.

Check availability and price on Amazon 🛒

📷 Fuji X-T50 — Amazon USA / Amazon Canada / Amazon UK / Amazon Australia

📷 Sony A6700 — Amazon USA / Amazon Canada / Amazon UK / Amazon Australia

Note: camerafight.com participates in the Amazon Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

---

🏁 Final Verdict — Sony A6700 vs Fujifilm X-T50

✅ In Short:

• Choose Sony A6700 if you want a high-performance APS-C body, excellent hybrid capability, and future-proof system flexibility.

• Choose Fujifilm X-T50 if you focus on stills, want a lighter, more intuitive photographic experience, and don’t need every video-centric feature.

---

🧠 Final Thoughts

Both cameras are excellent—but the “better” one really depends on how you shoot, what you carry, and what features you value most.

• If you carry your camera often, shoot video + stills and pursue flexibility → go A6700.

• If you prioritise photograph-feels, portability, minimal gear and stills-centric shooting → go X-T50.

Think about your shooting style, gear habits and long-term system plans — then choose the camera that fits you best.