Fujifilm X-S20 vs Sony A6700 mirrorless camera side by side comparison

Fujifilm X-S20 vs Sony A6700 | Which One Is Best For You?

Fujifilm X-S20 vs Sony A6700 – Which One Is Best for You?

The Fujifilm X-S20 and Sony A6700 are two of the best hybrid APS-C cameras available today.

Both deliver incredible photo and video performance in compact bodies, but they approach creativity in different ways.

The X-S20 offers Fujifilm’s signature color science and user-friendly design, while the A6700 focuses on next-level AI autofocus and full-frame-grade processing power.

So, which one should you buy? Let’s break down the differences.


⚙️ Overview – Fuji Creativity vs Sony Intelligence

  • Fujifilm X-S20: A compact, stabilized hybrid camera that combines Fuji’s famous color science with improved AI autofocus and 6.2K recording.

  • Sony A6700: A professional APS-C powerhouse with deep-learning autofocus, 4K 120p video, and cutting-edge processing borrowed from Sony’s flagship models.

In short:

  • X-S20 = Beautiful color, balance, and user-friendly versatility.

  • A6700 = Smart autofocus, 4K 120p, and pro-level reliability.


📸 Specifications Comparison

Feature Fujifilm X-S20 Sony A6700
Release Date May 2023 July 2023
Camera Type Mirrorless (Hybrid APS-C) Mirrorless (Hybrid APS-C)
Sensor APS-C 26.1 MP X-Trans CMOS 4 APS-C 26.0 MP BSI-CMOS
Image Processor X-Processor 5 BIONZ XR + AI Processing Unit
Lens Mount Fujifilm X-mount Sony E-mount
ISO Range 160–12,800 (expandable to 80–51,200) 100–32,000 (expandable to 102,400)
In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS) Yes, 5-axis (up to 7 stops) Yes, 5-axis
Autofocus System Hybrid phase-detection AF (425 points) Hybrid phase-detection AF (759 points)
AF Subject Recognition Humans, animals, birds, vehicles Humans, animals, birds, insects, vehicles, aircraft
Continuous Shooting Speed Up to 8 fps (mechanical), 20 fps (electronic, crop) Up to 11 fps
Video Recording Up to 6.2K 30p, 4K 60p Up to 4K 120p
Video Bit Depth / Color 10-bit 4:2:2 internal 10-bit 4:2:2 internal
Color Profiles F-Log2, Film Simulations S-Log3, S-Cinetone, HLG
RAW Video Output Yes, 12-bit via HDMI Yes, 16-bit via HDMI
Recording Limit No recording limit (thermal dependent) No recording limit (thermal dependent)
Viewfinder None 2.36M-dot OLED EVF
LCD Screen 3.0″ fully articulating touchscreen (1.84M dots) 3.0″ fully articulating touchscreen (1.03M dots)
Touch Functions Yes (AF, tracking, menus) Yes (AF, tracking, menus)
Product Showcase Mode No No
Background Defocus Button No No
Body Material Magnesium alloy Magnesium alloy
Weather Sealing No Yes (basic sealing)
Audio Options Mic input, headphone via USB-C Mic input, headphone out, digital MI shoe
Connectivity Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-C, HDMI Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB-C, HDMI
Battery Type NP-W235 NP-FZ100
Battery Life (CIPA) Approx. 750 shots Approx. 570 shots
Dimensions (W × H × D) 127.7 × 85.1 × 65.4 mm 122 × 69 × 75.1 mm
Weight (Body Only) Approx. 491 g Approx. 409 g
Price (Body Only) Approx. USD 1,300 Approx. USD 1,399 (check on Amazon)

🧱 Build and Handling

Both cameras are small, robust, and travel-friendly, but they offer very different experiences in hand.

The X-S20 feels like a compact DSLR — deep grip, simple control layout, and intuitive menus. It’s designed for hybrid creators who want stability and comfort.

The A6700 is slightly more angular but extremely well-built, featuring Sony’s modern touchscreen interface and excellent customization options.

👉 Verdict:

  • X-S20: Best ergonomics and simplicity.

  • A6700: Best for customizable, professional control.


🎯 Autofocus and Performance

Here’s where Sony takes the crown.

The A6700 features Sony’s 759-point AI-driven autofocus, inherited from its flagship Alpha series. It can identify humans, animals, birds, insects, cars, trains, and even aircraft — tracking them effortlessly during photo or video.

The X-S20 also offers AI-based autofocus, but it’s a newer implementation that’s very good, just slightly less refined than Sony’s real-time tracking.

In burst speed, both cameras are fast — 20 fps for Fuji (electronic) vs 11 fps for Sony — though the A6700 handles continuous tracking more intelligently.

👉 Verdict:

  • A6700: Industry-leading autofocus and subject recognition.

  • X-S20: Excellent, but a step behind in advanced tracking.


🎥 Video Capabilities

Both cameras are powerful hybrid tools, but their video priorities differ.

Fujifilm X-S20

  • 6.2K 30p internal 10-bit 4:2:2

  • 4K 60p (no crop)

  • Full HD 240p slow motion

  • F-Log2 support for wide dynamic range

  • “Vlog Mode” with easy exposure and mic settings

  • IBIS for handheld shooting

Sony A6700

  • 4K 120p for incredible slow motion

  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K

  • 10-bit 4:2:2 internal recording

  • S-Log3 and S-Cinetone color profiles

  • AI-assisted subject tracking for video

  • Excellent rolling shutter control

If you value Fuji’s color science and want a cinematic workflow, the X-S20 is outstanding.
If you need professional-level autofocus and high frame rates, the A6700 is unbeatable in this price range.

👉 Verdict:

  • X-S20: Best for creative filmmakers and vloggers.

  • A6700: Best for fast-paced, professional video work.


🧠 Image Quality

Both cameras use 26MP APS-C sensors, but the color philosophy differs.

The X-S20’s X-Trans sensor produces rich, filmic tones straight out of camera, with Fuji’s legendary film simulations (Velvia, Classic Chrome, Eterna, etc.).

The A6700’s Exmor R BSI sensor delivers cleaner results at higher ISOs and offers more neutral, flexible files for editing — ideal for commercial work or color grading.

👉 Verdict:

  • X-S20: Best for natural, artistic colors.

  • A6700: Best for low-light and professional post-production.


🔋 Battery and Storage

The X-S20 wins easily on battery life, with around 750 shots per charge using the NP-W235 — double the endurance of the X-S10.
The A6700 uses the same NP-FZ100 battery as Sony’s full-frame models, giving about 570 shots, still excellent.

Both support USB-C PD charging and use one SD UHS-II slot.

👉 Verdict:

  • X-S20: Better endurance for travel and vlogging.

  • A6700: Still strong, but shorter runtime.


💰 Price and Value

  • Fujifilm X-S20: ~$1,299

  • Sony A6700: ~$1,399

The X-S20 is slightly cheaper yet offers a more approachable shooting experience, better battery life, and Fuji’s gorgeous film simulations.
The A6700 justifies its higher cost with industry-leading AF, 4K 120p, and professional workflow options.

👉 Verdict:

  • X-S20: Best value for hybrid creators and vloggers.

  • A6700: Best long-term tool for professionals and action shooters.

Check availability and price on Amazon 🛒

📷 Fuji X-S20 — Amazon USA / Amazon Canada / Amazon UK / Amazon Australia

📷 Sony A6700 Amazon USA / Amazon Canada / Amazon UK / Amazon Australia

Note: camerafight.com participates in the Amazon Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.


🏁 Final Verdict — Fujifilm X-S20 vs Sony A6700

Type of User Recommended Camera
Portrait Photographer Fujifilm X-S20
Travel / Street Photographer Fujifilm X-S20
Sports / Wildlife Shooter Sony A6700
Filmmaker / Videographer Sony A6700
YouTuber / Vlogger Fujifilm X-S20
Hybrid Photo + Video Creator Both — depends on priorities
Professional / Commercial User Sony A6700

In short:

  • Choose the Fujifilm X-S20 if you want stunning color science, great ergonomics, and unbeatable battery life in a compact body.

  • Choose the Sony A6700 if you want AI autofocus, 4K 120p, and professional-level hybrid performance.


🛒 Check the Fujifilm X-S20 price on Amazon
🛒 Check the Sony A6700 price on Amazon


🧠 Final Thoughts

Both the Fujifilm X-S20 and Sony A6700 represent the pinnacle of APS-C mirrorless technology — compact, powerful, and incredibly versatile.

The X-S20 shines for creators who love Fuji’s color science, film simulations, and all-day battery life in a beautifully simple design.
The A6700, on the other hand, is a technical marvel — the smartest APS-C camera on the market, ideal for professionals who demand speed, accuracy, and consistency.

Either way, you’re getting a camera capable of professional-level photos and video — proof that APS-C systems are stronger than ever.

Similar Posts